THE DENTAL AWARDS 2025 – REGISTER NOW!

Straumann Group Presents the Neodent® Grand Morse® Implant System

Featured Products Promotional Features

  Posted by: Dental Design      14th March 2024

Patients and practitioners alike can’t fail to be inspired by the stunning results now offered by dental implants. Neodent’s Grand Morse® Implant System meets expectations with a portfolio that is engineered for predictable, immediate treatment in all bone types.

The Helix® Grand Morse® is an innovative hybrid implant, improving outcomes even in challenging situations.[i] [ii] [iii] [iv]

It includes:

  • Tapered body design
  • Hybrid contour
  • Dynamic, progressive thread design
  • Active apex, enabling immediate loading
  • The Neodent® Acqua® hydrophilic surface.

As dental implant consultant Cliff Gratz said in a recent review, these features make the Helix® implant ideal for ‘immediate loading and long-term aesthetics with a stable biologic width’.

Clinicians have come to expect cutting edge engineering in the simplest possible package from Neodent®, a Straumann Group brand. One prosthetic platform, one screwdriver, one implant driver and one surgical kit, allows for intuitive interventions for all bone types.[v] [vi] [vii] [viii]

For more information on the Neodent® Grand Morse® Implant System, visit

www.neodent-uk.co/portal

[i] Novellino MM, Sesma N, Zanardi PR, Laganá DC. Resonance frequency analysis of dental implants placed at the posterior maxilla varying the surface treatment only: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Jun 20. doi: 10.1111/cid.12510. [Epub ahead of print]

[ii] Sartoretto SC, Alves AT, Resende RF, et al. Early osseointegration driven by the surface chemistry and wettability of dental implants. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015 May-Jun;23(3):279-87.

[iii] Sartoretto SC, Alves AT, Zarranz L, et al. Hydrophilic surface of Ti6Al4V-ELI alloy improves the early bone apposition of sheep tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Jun 17. doi: 10.1111/clr.12894. [Epub ahead of print]

[iv] Val JE, Gómez-Moreno G, Ruiz-Linares M, et al. Effects of Surface Treatment Modification and Implant Design in Implants Placed Crestal and Subcrestally Applying Delayed Loading Protocol. J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Mar;28(2):552-558.

[v] Al-Nsour MM, Chan HL, Wang HL. Effect of the platform- switching technique on preservation of peri-implant marginal bone: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jan-Feb;27(1):138-45.

[vi] Annibali S, Bignozzi I, Cristalli MP, et al. Peri-implant marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing platform

switching versus conventionally restored implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Nov;39(11):1097-113.

[vii] Hsu YT, Lin GH, Wang HL. Effects of Platform-Switching on Peri-implant Soft and Hard Tissue Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(1):e9-e24.

[viii] Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics

Restorative Dentistry. 2006 Feb;26(1):9-17.


Join our
Mailing List

Sign up to our newsletter and keep up to date on the latest happenings in the dental market.

Sign up today